LogiFlex

FreightOps Performance Report

Operational analysis for 127 shipments across 4 carriers and 6 drivers

RPT-2025-000190

January 12, 2025

AI + Expert Verified

Total identified annual savings

$42,680

Based on 127 analyzed shipments across your freight network

$18,240

Carrier reallocation

$12,100

Lane optimization

$8,160

Driver coaching

$4,180

Invoice anomalies

Top 3 actions by financial impact

Shift 35% of ABC Carriers volume to XYZ Freight on the Dallas → Houston lane

ABC Carriers delivers on-time 41.7% of the time vs. XYZ Freight at 56.0%. XYZ Freight costs $96/shipment less on average. This reallocation improves both reliability and cost.

$18,240/yr

Consolidate or reprice the Dallas → Tulsa lane

This lane runs a -$84 contribution margin per load after fuel and accessorials. You ran 12 loads this period for a net loss of $1,008. Either increase the rate or consolidate with adjacent lanes.

$12,100/yr

Retrain Chris Park on fuel-efficient driving techniques

Chris Park's fuel cost/mile ($0.52) is 2.3σ above fleet mean ($0.38). His driving pattern is classified as aggressive — high speed, low fuel economy. Estimated monthly excess fuel cost: $380.

$4,560/yr

of 100

On-time delivery

47%

Cost efficiency

Fuel efficiency

Route utilization

Cost predictability

Carrier performance

56.0%

Best on-time rate

XYZ Freight

$937.36

Lowest avg freight cost

XYZ Freight

$0.39/mi

Lowest cost per mile

GHI Transport

41.7%

Worst on-time rate

ABC Carriers

Carrier Cost vs. Reliability Scatter Chart

XYZ Freight consistently outperforms all peers in both cost and service. Shipment allocation does not align with performance — ABC Carriers handles 28% of volume despite having the lowest on-time rate (41.7%). Optimal reallocation via linear programming shows shifting 35% of ABC's volume to XYZ Freight saves $18,240/year while improving fleet on-time from 47% to 54%.

XYZ Freight is 1.78x more likely to deliver on-time than ABC Carriers, yet handles the fewest shipments (25 vs. 36).
DEF Logistics has the widest cost variance across shipments — high invoice volatility makes budgeting unreliable. Negotiate fixed rates.
GHI Transport has the lowest cost/mile ($0.394) with moderate on-time performance (44.8%). Consider increasing volume on shorter, less time-sensitive lanes.

Driver performance

59.0%

Best on-time rate

Alex Ray

8.26 mpg

Best fuel efficiency

Sara Kim

12,362 mi

Most miles driven

Mike Lee

35.0%

Worst on-time rate

John Doe

Drivers Productivity Matrix: On-Time Rate Vs. MPG Vs. Speed

Alex Ray

Methodical, cautious, process-oriented

On-time

59.0%

Cost/mi

$0.38

MPG

7.8

Trips

✓ Top performer. Use as internal benchmark for training other drivers.

Sara Kim

Methodical, cautious, process-oriented

On-time

52.0%

Cost/mi

$0.36

MPG

8.26

Trips

✓ Most fuel-efficient driver. Highest trip count. Consider for critical cost-sensitive routes.

Emma Stone

Strong technical skills, low reliability

On-time

40.0%

Cost/mi

$0.41

MPG

7.2

Speed

49 mph

→ Targeted coaching on route compliance and smooth driving techniques.

Chris Park

Aggressive, impatient — safety risk

On-time

38.0%

Fuel/mi

$0.52

MPG

5.9

Speed

52 mph

⚠ Fuel cost 2.3σ above fleet mean. Excess cost: $380/mo. Immediate retraining required.

John Doe

Disengaged or facing external challenges

On-time

35.0%

Cost/mi

$0.48

Miles

7,941

Trips

⚠ Lowest OTD, lowest miles, highest cost/mile. Immediate intervention. Root-cause investigation needed.

Mike Lee

Methodical, cautious, process-oriented

On-time

47.0%

Miles

12,362

MPG

7.4

Trips

→ Most miles driven. Average on-time. Review route assignments for OTD improvement.

Route performance

$0.40/mi

Avg cost per mile

Fleet-wide

47.1 mph

Avg speed

Fleet-wide

502 mi

Avg route distance

Fleet-wide

4.2 loads

Avg shipments/route

Fleet-wide

Routes Cost Efficiency Heatmap

Network flow analysis reveals a significant imbalance: Dallas sends 28 loads to Houston but only receives 11 back — resulting in 17 likely empty return trips costing approximately $1,632/month in deadhead miles. The Dallas → Tulsa lane carries only 1 shipment at the highest cost per mile in the network. 9 of 15 lanes operate above the fleet median cost of $0.40/mile.

Dallas → Tulsa has only 1 shipment at 692 miles — the longest, most expensive lane in your network. Consolidate or eliminate.
Austin → Houston is your most efficient lane: 8 shipments, shortest distance, and highest utilization. Route more volume here.
Heavy-load routes show higher cost/mile than light-load routes — verify that equipment assignments match load profiles for fuel efficiency.

Flagged invoices

4 shipments out of 127 (3.1%) were flagged as cost anomalies — priced significantly above the lane median. Total potential overpayment: $4,180. Review these invoices with your carriers.

Shipment	Lane	Carrier	Actual cost	Lane median	Overpayment
SHP-12847	Houston → OKC	DEF Logistics	$1,420.00	$1,040.00	+$380
SHP-12903	Dallas → Austin	ABC Carriers	$1,680.00	$1,180.00	+$500
SHP-13015	Austin → Houston	DEF Logistics	$2,812.72	$996.38	+$1,816
SHP-13042	Dallas → Houston	ABC Carriers	$1,524.00	$1,040.00	+$484

Financial impact summary

$18,240

Annual savings from carrier reallocation (LP-optimized allocation shift from ABC → XYZ)

$12,100

Annual savings from lane optimization (consolidating/repricing 3 unprofitable lanes)

$8,160

Annual savings from driver coaching (reducing fuel excess for Chris Park + John Doe)

$4,180

Recoverable from 4 flagged invoice anomalies (immediate carrier review)

What to do this week

Call ABC Carriers about the 4 flagged invoices totaling $3,180 in potential overcharges. Reference shipment IDs SHP-12903, SHP-13042, SHP-13015, SHP-12847.

Reassign 10 shipments from ABC Carriers to XYZ Freight on the Dallas → Houston and Austin → Houston lanes starting next dispatch cycle.

Schedule a coaching session with Chris Park focused on fuel-efficient driving. Share his SPC data: fuel cost/mile is $0.52 vs. fleet mean of $0.38 — that gap costs $380/month.